A year ago this month, we noted [1] the candor with which Western businessmen flocked to Libya on the very afternoon of Col. Qadaffi's murder.
A provisional government we had never heard of in the news was there waiting to greet deplaning German and French businessmen with contracts and pens in hand. The New York Times reported that at U.S. instance and request the Security Council had unfrozen $1.5 billion in seized Libyan assets in order to provide "aid" to the country.
So it was with some bemusement that we read in the New York Times today [2] that,
One has to be an incurable moron not to realize the game afoot. What is amusing, in a contemptuous way, is how the Western "leftishts" fall a-sucker over and over. It apparently suffices to label the targetted ruler an ogre, a tyrant, a monster who stockpiles weapons of mass destruction, oppresses women and tortures dissidents for the left to line up like good dumbfucks cheering on the latest Crusade for Democracy (and Reproductive Rights).
The United States has gotten quite good at this game, given that its own indpendence was foisted on the world by twittering "Committees of Correspondence" waxing indignant over contrived atrocities such as the "Boston Massacre." The United States honed the technique in Hispanic America where it was always able to find some corrupt "liberal-minded" prestanombre ("name-lender") who could recite Jeffersonian talking points by heart and who just needed a few companies of Marines to mow down "bandits" and "insurrectionists." Why, just last month, the United States engineered a 48 hour impeachment of Paraguay's President Lugo. Within weeks the "raison de coup" became clear: Monsanto was given the permission which Lugo had denied it to wreak an ecological holocaust on Paraguay with genetically modified seed and pesticides.
But the Spontaneous Impeachment in Paraguay was child's play -- a mere trip down memory lane -- in comparison to America's newly honed and droned technique for "freeing up" a target country's assets.
We recently wrote [3] that the core strategy of the U.S. "security wars" is to promote chaos and civil degradation so as to create perpetually fluid conditions for exploitation and control of resources. The strategists and leaders of the "First World" have realized that it is no longer necessary to go through the trouble and expense of installing despot puppets like Augusto Pinochet. It quite suffices to destroy whatever national authority exists and to negotiate contracts with whatever tribal or urban gangs (passing off as a "transitional government) are nearest to the bananas we want to pick.
As Rome created a desert and called it peace, the National Capitalist United States creates chaos and calls it freedom.
A provisional government we had never heard of in the news was there waiting to greet deplaning German and French businessmen with contracts and pens in hand. The New York Times reported that at U.S. instance and request the Security Council had unfrozen $1.5 billion in seized Libyan assets in order to provide "aid" to the country.
So it was with some bemusement that we read in the New York Times today [2] that,
"The State Department is considering positioning additional food and medical supplies in the region and is studying how to dismantle the raft of American and European sanctions against Syria quickly to allow investment to flow in and business to resume, avoiding further deterioration of life for ordinary people. "
One has to be an incurable moron not to realize the game afoot. What is amusing, in a contemptuous way, is how the Western "leftishts" fall a-sucker over and over. It apparently suffices to label the targetted ruler an ogre, a tyrant, a monster who stockpiles weapons of mass destruction, oppresses women and tortures dissidents for the left to line up like good dumbfucks cheering on the latest Crusade for Democracy (and Reproductive Rights).
The United States has gotten quite good at this game, given that its own indpendence was foisted on the world by twittering "Committees of Correspondence" waxing indignant over contrived atrocities such as the "Boston Massacre." The United States honed the technique in Hispanic America where it was always able to find some corrupt "liberal-minded" prestanombre ("name-lender") who could recite Jeffersonian talking points by heart and who just needed a few companies of Marines to mow down "bandits" and "insurrectionists." Why, just last month, the United States engineered a 48 hour impeachment of Paraguay's President Lugo. Within weeks the "raison de coup" became clear: Monsanto was given the permission which Lugo had denied it to wreak an ecological holocaust on Paraguay with genetically modified seed and pesticides.
But the Spontaneous Impeachment in Paraguay was child's play -- a mere trip down memory lane -- in comparison to America's newly honed and droned technique for "freeing up" a target country's assets.
We recently wrote [3] that the core strategy of the U.S. "security wars" is to promote chaos and civil degradation so as to create perpetually fluid conditions for exploitation and control of resources. The strategists and leaders of the "First World" have realized that it is no longer necessary to go through the trouble and expense of installing despot puppets like Augusto Pinochet. It quite suffices to destroy whatever national authority exists and to negotiate contracts with whatever tribal or urban gangs (passing off as a "transitional government) are nearest to the bananas we want to pick.
As Rome created a desert and called it peace, the National Capitalist United States creates chaos and calls it freedom.
©Barfo, 2012
[1] http://barfos.blogspot.com/2011/08/transparency.html
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/world/middleeast/state-dept-and-pentagon-planning-for-post-assad-syria.html
[3] http://wcg-journal.blogspot.com/2011/06/mining-harvesting-and-civil-carcinogens.html
.
No comments:
Post a Comment